<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Average Joes Have It Better Than Gorgeous Hunks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/</link>
	<description>A Modern-Day Matchmaker&#039;s Views on Dating, Matchmaking, Relationship, Love &#38; Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 17:14:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet</title>
		<link>http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/comment-page-1/#comment-88668</link>
		<dc:creator>Violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/#comment-88668</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-86378&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Zabrinah Shepherd&lt;/a&gt;, thanks Zabrinah! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-86378" rel="nofollow">@Zabrinah Shepherd</a>, thanks Zabrinah! <img src='http://www.violetlim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Violet</title>
		<link>http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/comment-page-1/#comment-88667</link>
		<dc:creator>Violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2011 20:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/#comment-88667</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-86815&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@MB&lt;/a&gt;, thanks for dropping by, and well said! Definitely... sharing the same values, same life goals and growing together is much more important than looks! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-86815" rel="nofollow">@MB</a>, thanks for dropping by, and well said! Definitely&#8230; sharing the same values, same life goals and growing together is much more important than looks! <img src='http://www.violetlim.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MB</title>
		<link>http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/comment-page-1/#comment-86815</link>
		<dc:creator>MB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 05:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/#comment-86815</guid>
		<description>When it comes to physical attributes though, I gotta say beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder. A pretty boy who cannot commit to a monogamous steady relationship is a big turn-off, whereas an average so-so looking guy ends up looking much more attractive because he is faithful, devoted and can provide security in the relationship.
I&#039;ve been reading &quot;Mr. Good Enough&quot; - a book by Lori Gottlieb, in which she wrote about women and men having different dating criterias. I think that ultimately most women desire to settle down with a kind-hearted, loving, dependable partner and raise a family together. Therefore, having the same long-term goals and sharing the same vision with someone is, in my opinion, much more important than their physical looks.
-MB. 
http://team-moonberry.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to physical attributes though, I gotta say beauty is indeed in the eye of the beholder. A pretty boy who cannot commit to a monogamous steady relationship is a big turn-off, whereas an average so-so looking guy ends up looking much more attractive because he is faithful, devoted and can provide security in the relationship.<br />
I&#039;ve been reading &quot;Mr. Good Enough&quot; &#8211; a book by Lori Gottlieb, in which she wrote about women and men having different dating criterias. I think that ultimately most women desire to settle down with a kind-hearted, loving, dependable partner and raise a family together. Therefore, having the same long-term goals and sharing the same vision with someone is, in my opinion, much more important than their physical looks.<br />
-MB.<br />
<a href="http://team-moonberry.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://team-moonberry.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zabrinah Shepherd</title>
		<link>http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/comment-page-1/#comment-86378</link>
		<dc:creator>Zabrinah Shepherd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Dec 2010 10:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.violetlim.com/2010/11/22/do-average-joes-have-it-better-than-gorgeous-hunks/#comment-86378</guid>
		<description>What an interesting topic!
&#160;
I completely agree that the overall approach is the best one. Players really do portray a sense of control and coolness. They definitely do not have to be good looking. Haha. I have seen it.!
&#160;
Great article!
&#160;
~Zabrinah
http://www.zabrinah.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting topic!<br />
&nbsp;<br />
I completely agree that the overall approach is the best one. Players really do portray a sense of control and coolness. They definitely do not have to be good looking. Haha. I have seen it.!<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Great article!<br />
&nbsp;<br />
~Zabrinah<br />
<a href="http://www.zabrinah.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zabrinah.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
